Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Actuarial Discussion Forum > Life
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

DW Simpson
Actuarial Jobs

Visit our site for the most up to date jobs for actuaries.

Actuarial Salary Surveys
Property & Casualty, Health, Life, Pension and Non-Tradtional Jobs.

Actuarial Meeting Schedule
Browse this year's meetings and which recruiters will attend.

Contact DW Simpson
Have a question?
Let's talk.
You'll be glad you did.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #81  
Old 07-22-2019, 01:37 PM
campbell's Avatar
campbell campbell is offline
Mary Pat Campbell
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NY
Studying for duolingo and coursera
Favorite beer: Murphy's Irish Stout
Posts: 89,859
Blog Entries: 6
Default

https://www.thinkadvisor.com/2019/07...&utm_term=tadv

Quote:
Insurer Favors 'Sex' Over 'Gender' in Life Policy Overviews
Pacific Life says 'sex' and 'gender' are not really the same thing.
Spoiler:
A life insurer says life underwriters need to know about an insured’s sex at birth, not just the applicant’s current gender identity.
Pacific Life Insurance Company says any revised versions of life policy overview summary regulations should refer to the insured’s sex, not to the insured’s gender.
(Related: A Look at the Future of Life Insurance Policy Illustrations)
“‘Gender; is a fluid concept while ‘Sex’ refers to genetic sex at birth,” Pacific Life says in a comment letter sent to an arm of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). “Using ‘Sex’ enables insurers to apply traditional underwriting practices that are based on the insured’s or proposed insured’s genetic sex at birth.”
Pacific Life sent the letter to the NAIC’s Life Insurance Illustration Issues Working Group.
The Background
The NAIC is a group for state insurance regulators. It develops “models,” or examples of what state insurance laws or regulations could look like, to help states share legal and policymaking expertise, and to help states make their insurance rules more like other states’ insurance rules.
The Life Insurance Illustration Issues Working Group is exploring the idea of improving the narrative policy summary required by a section of the NAIC’s existing Life Insurance Illustrations Model Regulation.
The working group is also reviewing the policy overview required the NAIC’s Life Insurance Disclosure Model Regulation.
The working group recently asked the public for comments on the Life Insurance Disclosure Model Regulation policy overview requirements. The working group is preparing to discuss the comments July 30, during a conference call meeting.
Pacific Life Definitions Comments
Pacific Life talks about the distinction between ‘sex’ and ‘gender’ in comments on the definitions section in a proposed draft update of the policy overview model.
The update drafters have referred to the “gender of the insured or insureds” in a description of “information about the insured” that ought to be included in a life insurance policy overview.
The current version of that section suggests that an insurer ought to include the “date of birth of insured or insureds” in the policy overview.
Pacific Life has proposed deleting “date of birth of insured or insureds.”
“Personally identifying information not necessary to the provision of a policy overview should be deleted from the proposed model revision,” the company says.
Pacific Life also has proposed a number of other changes, such as replacing a requirement that a policy overview include the insured’s “risk class with a statement as to where the insured can find additional information regarding risk classes” with a requirement that the overview merely give the policyholder’s risk class.
Every life insure has a different risk class structure, and getting more details about risk class would require that the insured have access to the insurer’s underwriting manual, Pacific Life says.
“For this reason, detailed risk class information would not be a useful consumer comparison tool and should be deleted,” the company says. “For policy overview purposes, a simple provision of ‘risk class’ will indicate basic class distinctions which might be useful to a consumer, e.g., smoker versus non-smoker.”
Resources
The Life Insurance Illustration Issues Working Group section of the NAIC website is available here.
The link to the Pacific Life comment letter is in the Meeting Materials section for the July 30 conference call meeting.
https://naic-cms.org/cmte_a_liii_wg.htm

https://naic-cms.org/sites/default/f...t%20062119.pdf
__________________
It's STUMP

LinkedIn Profile
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 09-04-2019, 07:08 AM
campbell's Avatar
campbell campbell is offline
Mary Pat Campbell
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NY
Studying for duolingo and coursera
Favorite beer: Murphy's Irish Stout
Posts: 89,859
Blog Entries: 6
Default

https://www.thinkadvisor.com/2019/08...&utm_term=tadv
Quote:
What If Life Applicants Decline to Choose a Gender?
An NAIC staffer is asking life insurers how they respond to consumers who identify themselves as being nonbinary.
Spoiler:
Some people now try to avoid identifying themselves as male or female. In some cases, those people prefer to describe themselves as being “nonbinary.”

An actuary on the staff at the National Association of Insurance of Commissioners (NAIC) is wondering whether, and how, the existence of nonbinary people might affect the world of life insurance.
(Related: Insurer Favors ‘Sex’ Over ‘Gender’ in Life Policy Overviews)

Reggie Mazyck, an NAIC life actuary who serves as a contact person for the NAIC’s Life Actuarial Task Force, is looking into the matter, according to a copy of the draft minutes for an in-person task force session held in early August, in New York, at the NAIC’s summer national meeting.
Mazyck has started his research by sending an email to the Life Regulatory Actuarial email list.

Mazyck has asked for “information on any regulatory responses related to insurance policy applicants identifying themselves as nonbinary and choosing not to make a gender selection when applying for insurance coverage,” according to the draft minutes. “He asked any company willing to share its company policy or practice on the issue to contact him.”
__________________
It's STUMP

LinkedIn Profile
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.33198 seconds with 9 queries